<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: American Apparel Gives The Average Gal A Shot At Modeling</title> <atom:link href="http://fashionindie.com/american-apparel-gives-the-average-gal-a-shot-at-modeling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fashionindie.com/american-apparel-gives-the-average-gal-a-shot-at-modeling/</link> <description>FashionIndie features all facets of fashion lifestyle.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Fashion democracy!</title><link>http://fashionindie.com/american-apparel-gives-the-average-gal-a-shot-at-modeling/comment-page-1/#comment-17904</link> <dc:creator>Fashion democracy!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:57:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://fashionindie.com/?p=30181#comment-17904</guid> <description>great potential and market.  I feel like they are doing what Youtube did for creative filmmakers and Myspace for musicians.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great potential and market.  I feel like they are doing what Youtube did for creative filmmakers and Myspace for musicians.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: judith</title><link>http://fashionindie.com/american-apparel-gives-the-average-gal-a-shot-at-modeling/comment-page-1/#comment-17844</link> <dc:creator>judith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:03:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://fashionindie.com/?p=30181#comment-17844</guid> <description>is it just me, or does this seem like a ploy to get people to forgive them for their pornographic ad campaigns? (specifically the one that starred an actual porn star whose photos were similar to the nude madonna photo)given what the company has been like for the past few months, and my physical distaste for dov charney,  im very skeptical of everything they do.also, this is just a general rant - but its not like the american apparel stuff is even good quality or well made.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it just me, or does this seem like a ploy to get people to forgive them for their pornographic ad campaigns? (specifically the one that starred an actual porn star whose photos were similar to the nude madonna photo)</p><p>given what the company has been like for the past few months, and my physical distaste for dov charney,  im very skeptical of everything they do.</p><p>also, this is just a general rant &#8211; but its not like the american apparel stuff is even good quality or well made.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: S!ick</title><link>http://fashionindie.com/american-apparel-gives-the-average-gal-a-shot-at-modeling/comment-page-1/#comment-17829</link> <dc:creator>S!ick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:53:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://fashionindie.com/?p=30181#comment-17829</guid> <description>&quot;Yea&quot; for:  real chicks...regular women...natural gurls...(I&#039;m a big fan.)    8)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yea&#8221; for:  real chicks&#8230;regular women&#8230;natural gurls&#8230;</p><p>(I&#8217;m a big fan.) <img
src='http://Fiw3.fashionindie.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 520/521 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Fiw3.fashionindie.com

Served from: fashionindie.com @ 2012-02-16 20:24:39 -->
