<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>FashionIndie &#187; dooney and bourke</title> <atom:link href="http://fashionindie.com/tag/dooney-and-bourke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fashionindie.com</link> <description>FashionIndie features all facets of fashion lifestyle.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:48:36 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Louis Vuitton Lost to Dooney &amp; Bourke</title><link>http://fashionindie.com/louise-vuitton-lost-to-dooney-bourke/</link> <comments>http://fashionindie.com/louise-vuitton-lost-to-dooney-bourke/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Rebecca Alexander</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[GIRLS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[dooney and bourke]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Louis Vuitton]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://fashionindie.com/?p=4082</guid> <description><![CDATA[According to this morning&#8217;s WWD, Louis Vuitton lost it&#8217;s four year battle with Dooney &#38; Bourke. &#8220;A Manhattan federal judge has ruled in favor of Dooney &#38; Bourke in a four-year trademark battle with Louis Vuitton. U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin said Dooney &#38; Bourke&#8217;s &#8220;It Bag&#8221; monogram design did not infringe on Vuitton&#8217;s [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: center;"><img
class="aligncenter" src="http://www.counterfeitchic.com/Images/lv_v_dooney&amp;bourke.jpg" alt="Louis Vuitton Lost to Dooney & Bourke"  title="Louis Vuitton Lost to Dooney & Bourke" /></p><p>According to this morning&#8217;s WWD, Louis Vuitton lost it&#8217;s four year battle with Dooney &amp; Bourke.</p><p>&#8220;A Manhattan federal judge has ruled in favor of Dooney &amp; Bourke in a four-year trademark battle with Louis Vuitton. U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin said Dooney &amp; Bourke&#8217;s &#8220;It Bag&#8221; monogram design did not infringe on Vuitton&#8217;s Monograme Multicolore handbag collection.&#8221;</p><p>Isn&#8217;t it obvious that all other small handbag companies are trying to cash in on the wealth LV had with it&#8217;s  signature monograph? Even if it is a little different, the concept (marketing ploy to make more money) is the same shit.</p><p
style="text-align: center;">Agree of disagree?</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://fashionindie.com/louise-vuitton-lost-to-dooney-bourke/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 523/533 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Fiw3.fashionindie.com

Served from: fashionindie.com @ 2012-02-16 02:33:53 -->
