<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FashionIndie &#187; dooney and bourke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fashionindie.com/tag/dooney-and-bourke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fashionindie.com</link>
	<description>FashionIndie features all facets of fashion lifestyle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 21:07:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Louis Vuitton Lost to Dooney &amp; Bourke</title>
		<link>http://fashionindie.com/louise-vuitton-lost-to-dooney-bourke/</link>
		<comments>http://fashionindie.com/louise-vuitton-lost-to-dooney-bourke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Alexander</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GIRLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dooney and bourke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Vuitton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fashionindie.com/?p=4082</guid>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
			According to this morning&#8217;s WWD, Louis Vuitton lost it&#8217;s four year battle with Dooney &#38; Bourke. &#8220;A Manhattan federal judge has ruled in favor of Dooney &#38; Bourke in a four-year trademark battle with Louis Vuitton. U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin said Dooney &#38; Bourke&#8217;s &#8220;It Bag&#8221; monogram design did not infringe on Vuitton&#8217;s [...]
			]]>
		</description>
		
			<content:encoded>
			<![CDATA[
			<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.counterfeitchic.com/Images/lv_v_dooney&amp;bourke.jpg" alt="Louis Vuitton Lost to Dooney & Bourke"  title="Louis Vuitton Lost to Dooney & Bourke" /></p>
<p>According to this morning&#8217;s WWD, Louis Vuitton lost it&#8217;s four year battle with Dooney &amp; Bourke.</p>
<p>&#8220;A Manhattan federal judge has ruled in favor of Dooney &amp; Bourke in a four-year trademark battle with Louis Vuitton. U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin said Dooney &amp; Bourke&#8217;s &#8220;It Bag&#8221; monogram design did not infringe on Vuitton&#8217;s Monograme Multicolore handbag collection.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it obvious that all other small handbag companies are trying to cash in on the wealth LV had with it&#8217;s  signature monograph? Even if it is a little different, the concept (marketing ploy to make more money) is the same shit.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Agree of disagree?</p>
			]]>
		</content:encoded>
		
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fashionindie.com/louise-vuitton-lost-to-dooney-bourke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 532/534 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: fashionindie.com @ 2012-05-30 05:37:10 -->
