<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FashionIndie &#187; photoshop disasters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fashionindie.com/tag/photoshop-disasters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fashionindie.com</link>
	<description>FashionIndie features all facets of fashion lifestyle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 23:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped</title>
		<link>http://fashionindie.com/rs-mad-men-cover-is-awesome-totally-photoshopped/</link>
		<comments>http://fashionindie.com/rs-mad-men-cover-is-awesome-totally-photoshopped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Fashion Web</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BACKSTAGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botched-rolling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolling Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shot-the-cast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fashionindie.com/rs-mad-men-cover-is-awesome-totally-photoshopped/</guid>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
			 Rolling Stone — arbiter of all that is cool and, in all likelihood, naked – shot the cast of AMC’s “Mad Men” for their special television issue. The cover image, which features Elisabeth Moss , January Jones , Jon Hamm , and Christina Hendricks , would be amazing if it didn’t have so ...
			]]>
		</description>
		
			<content:encoded>
			<![CDATA[
			<p><img src="http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/a026d6223fezours.jpg.jpg" title="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" alt="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" />&nbsp;<img src="http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/ef00dfb17emenbig.jpg.jpg" title="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" alt="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" />&nbsp;<img src="http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/30edfacfd60-mad1.jpg.jpg" title="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" alt="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" />&nbsp;<img src="http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/0ab88fff9f0-mad1.jpg.jpg" title="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" alt="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" />&nbsp;<img src="http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/677b65fa130-mad2.jpg.jpg" title="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" alt="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" />&nbsp;<img src="http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/5117c45f510-mad3.jpg.jpg" title="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" alt="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" />&nbsp;<img src="http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/ab58157f3a0-mad4.jpg.jpg" title="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" alt="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped" /><br />
 Rolling Stone — arbiter of all that is cool and, in all likelihood, naked – shot the cast of AMC’s “Mad Men” for their special television issue. The cover image, which features Elisabeth Moss , January Jones , Jon Hamm , and Christina Hendricks , would be amazing if it didn’t have so &#8230;<br />
<span id="more-155016"></span><br />
<br />
LINK:<a target="_blank" href="http://www.styleite.com/media/rolling-stone-mad-men-cover/" title="RS Mad Men Cover Is Awesome, Totally Photoshopped">http://www.styleite.com/media/rolling-stone-mad-men-cover/</a></p>
			]]>
		</content:encoded>
		
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fashionindie.com/rs-mad-men-cover-is-awesome-totally-photoshopped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MOMENTS OF PHOTOSHOP: Vogue&#8217;s November Cover</title>
		<link>http://fashionindie.com/vogue-assaults-november-issue-with-photoshop/</link>
		<comments>http://fashionindie.com/vogue-assaults-november-issue-with-photoshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Frazier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FASHION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Wintour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annie Leibovitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FASHION FAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vogue november]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fashionindie.com/vogue-assaults-november-issue-with-photoshop/</guid>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[
			Somebody at Vogue really messed up with this cover...who do you think it is to blame?
			]]>
		</description>
		
			<content:encoded>
			<![CDATA[
			<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-67146" title="VOGUEnov100909" src="http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/VOGUEnov100909.jpg" alt="MOMENTS OF PHOTOSHOP: Vogues November Cover" width="340" height="448" /></p>
<p>Not quite sure what went wrong here, but Annie Leibovitz or Anna Wintour really fucked up this month. Maybe Vogue couldn&#8217;t afford to get all of these actresses to this mountain beach scene at the same time (or at all?) so they thought photoshop would be a good alternative. The results? SO BAD. I&#8217;m thinking it was Anna, because Annie scored bigtime on the inside:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-67145" title="500x_01v" src="http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/500x_01v.jpg" alt="MOMENTS OF PHOTOSHOP: Vogues November Cover" width="500" height="345" /></p>
<p>However, Annie Leibovitz is known for making composites, but normally they&#8217;re pretty believable. Who do you think is the culprit?</p>
<p>LINK LOVE: <a href="http://jezebel.com/5378098/vogues--november-cover-photoshop-of-horrors" target="_blank">Jezebel</a></p>

<p><img class='alignleft wp-image-60' alt='' src='http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/500x_01v.jpg' width='500' height='345' /></p><p></p><h1></h1>
<p><img class='alignleft wp-image-60' alt='' src='http://fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/VOGUEnov100909.jpg' width='340' height='448' /></p><p></p><h1></h1>			]]>
		</content:encoded>
		
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fashionindie.com/vogue-assaults-november-issue-with-photoshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 711/725 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via fashionindie.lookbooks.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: fashionindie.com @ 2012-05-30 22:22:08 -->
