<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>FashionIndie &#187; portfolio</title> <atom:link href="http://fashionindie.com/tag/portfolio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fashionindie.com</link> <description>FashionIndie features all facets of fashion lifestyle.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Don&#8217;t stereotype all Fashion bloggers</title><link>http://fashionindie.com/dont-stereotype-all-fashion-bloggers/</link> <comments>http://fashionindie.com/dont-stereotype-all-fashion-bloggers/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:36:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>The Fashion Web</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[BACKSTAGE]]></category> <category><![CDATA[descriptions]]></category> <category><![CDATA[designer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FASHION]]></category> <category><![CDATA[London Fashion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[people]]></category> <category><![CDATA[portfolio]]></category> <category><![CDATA[united-states]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://fashionindie.com/dont-stereotype-all-fashion-bloggers/</guid> <description><![CDATA[ Fashion bloggers have been receiving bad press at Fashion Week of late. Apparently turning up at any opportunity all 'dolled up', grabbing freebies, celebrity spotting and if they're lucky enough to get an invite to a show, they hardly write anything about the collection but instead 'whose on front...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img
src="http://Fiw3.fashionindie.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/41888b40a732132.jpg.jpg" title="Dont stereotype all Fashion bloggers" alt="Dont stereotype all Fashion bloggers" /></center><br
/> Fashion bloggers have been receiving bad press at Fashion Week of late. Apparently turning up at any opportunity all &#8216;dolled up&#8217;, grabbing freebies, celebrity spotting and if they&#8217;re lucky enough to get an invite to a show, they hardly write anything about the collection but instead &#8216;whose on front&#8230;<br
/> <span
id="more-163006"></span><br
/> <br
/> LINK:<a
target="_blank" href="http://www.theyenvy.us/xn/detail/2394740:BlogPost:176964" title="Don't stereotype all Fashion bloggers">http://www.theyenvy.us/xn/detail/2394740:BlogPost:176964</a><br
/></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://fashionindie.com/dont-stereotype-all-fashion-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Men&#8217;s Vogue (Or Portfolio? Or GQ?) Can&#8217;t Make Up Their Mind</title><link>http://fashionindie.com/dead-magazine-replaced-with-dead-magazine-conde-nast/</link> <comments>http://fashionindie.com/dead-magazine-replaced-with-dead-magazine-conde-nast/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:18:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Hillary Frazier</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Mens]]></category> <category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gq]]></category> <category><![CDATA[men's vogue]]></category> <category><![CDATA[portfolio]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://fashionindie.com/dead-magazine-replaced-with-dead-magazine-conde-nast/</guid> <description><![CDATA[In 2007 Conde Nast decided to start Portfolio, a men&#8217;s fashion magazine (possibly in preparation for the fall of Men&#8217;s Vogue?), and when they decided to fold Men&#8217;s Vogue in 2008, they sent their subscribers a notice saying they would no be receiving Portfolio. Just kidding, Portfolio drowned, you&#8217;ll now be receiving GQ. Because it [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="text-align: center;"><img
class="size-full wp-image-49951  aligncenter" title="Picture 1" src="http://Fiw3.fashionindie.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Picture-122.png" alt="Mens Vogue (Or Portfolio? Or GQ?) Cant Make Up Their Mind" width="502" height="327" /></p><p
style="text-align: left;">In 2007 Conde Nast decided to start Portfolio, a men&#8217;s fashion magazine (possibly in preparation for the fall of Men&#8217;s Vogue?), and when they decided to fold Men&#8217;s Vogue in 2008, they sent their subscribers a notice saying they would no be receiving Portfolio.</p><p
style="text-align: left;">Just kidding, Portfolio drowned, you&#8217;ll now be receiving GQ. Because it wouldn&#8217;t have made sense to just replace Men&#8217;s Vogue with GQ in the first place instead of starting up a new magazine after the exact same one failed (well, under a different name, of course)&#8230;no sense at all.</p><p>SOURCE: <a
href="http://gawker.com/5302664/dead-magazine-replaced-with-dead-magazine" target="_blank">Gawker</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://fashionindie.com/dead-magazine-replaced-with-dead-magazine-conde-nast/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 582/606 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Fiw3.fashionindie.com

Served from: fashionindie.com @ 2012-02-15 15:31:49 -->
